题目内容 (请给出正确答案)
提问人:网友w*****2 发布时间:2022年3月21日 23:47
[填空题]

合格加特长是()关系。

参考答案
十点题库官方参考答案 (由十点题库聘请的专业题库老师提供的解答)
更多“合格加特长是()关系。”相关的问题

当向Excel工作表单元格输入公式时,使用单元格地址D$2引用D列2行单元格,该单元格的引用称为(  )

(2.0分)
A . 交叉地址引用B . 混合地址引用C . 相对地址引用D . 绝对地址引用
点击查看答案
变电站和高达建筑物安装的避雷针就是利用()原理而设臵的。
点击查看答案
中国银行间市场交易商协会(以下简称交易商协会)负责受理企业债务融资工具的发行注册。交易商协会设注册委员会,注册委员会通过注册会议行使职责。下面关于注册委员会说法正确的是(  )。①注册会议原则上每周召开一次②注册会议原则上每3天召开一次③注册会议由5名注册委员会委员参加④注册会议由3名注册委员会委员参加
A.①④ B.①③ C.②③ D.②④
点击查看答案
流动人口是指离开户籍地(县、市或者市辖区)异地居住的成年育龄人员,但是下列人员不列入流动人口之内()。
A.到异地从事务工、经商、办企业等活动,并取得工资收入或者经营收入的人员;
B.因旅游、出差、就医、访友、探亲等事由异地居住并预期将返回户籍所在地居住的人员;
C.不以取得工资收入为目的,随同家庭成员、亲友或者独自在异地居住的人员;
D.在直辖市、设区的市行政区域内区与区之间异地居住的人员;
E.在异地读大学的人员。
点击查看答案
风险分级是指通过采用科学、合理方法对危险源所伴随的风险进行定量或定性评价,根据()划分等级。风险分级的目的是为()
点击查看答案

正常肺部叩诊音呈

A . 浊音
B . 清音C . 鼓音D . 过清音
点击查看答案
我国是一个统一的多民族国家,在漫长的历史发展中,各民族逐渐形成了()的分布局面,你中有我,我中有你,密不可分
A.大杂居
B.小集中
C.小聚居
D.大分散
点击查看答案
2016年9月,《长江经济带发展规划纲要》正式印发,发挥()的核心作用,将长江经济带建设成:生态文明建设的先行示范带、引领全国转型发展的创新驱动带、具有全球影响力的内河经济带、东中西互动合作的协调发展带,
A . 上海、南京、合肥
B . 南京、郑州、成都
C . 上海、武汉、重庆
D . 上海、南昌、贵阳
点击查看答案

心房和心室收缩在时间上不重叠,后者必定落在前者完毕后的原因是( )

A . 窦房结到心房距离近,而心室距离远B . 心房传导速度快,心室肌传导速度慢C . 心房交界处传导速度慢而形成房室延搁D . 浦肯野纤维传导速度慢
点击查看答案
市场营销理论只适用于盈利性组织(公司),不适用于非盈利组织。
点击查看答案
背景 某商品住宅小区建设的招标大会上,共有6家单位来进行投标。在开标大会上,最后评分环节中,某实力强大的
背景某商品住宅小区建设的招标大会上,共有6家单位来进行投标。在开标大会上,最后评分环节中,某实力强大的单位仅获得87.5分,而胜出并中标单位获得了96.8分。在分析原因时发现:在评分标准中,“信誉分”评分规定中,以同类工程获奖证书为依据,其中“省优”以上每项3分,限15分;“市优”以上每项2分,限10分;“优良”以上每项1分,限10分。而该单位经营人员认为“省优”是在“优良”的基础上评定的。为证实自己的实力,在投标书中附上了“鲁班奖”三项,“省优”15项,“市优”10项,而未附上“优良”项目(该单位实际有“优良”奖项上百件)。在评定时,评标委员会以其缺项为由,扣去其10分。从而失去了中标的机会。

某商品住宅小区建设的招标大会上,共有6家单位来进行投标。在开标大会上,最后评分环节中,某实力强大的单位仅获得87.5分,而胜出并中标单位获得了96.8分。在分析原因时发现:在评分标准中,“信誉分”评分规定中,以同类工程获奖证书为依据,其中“省优”以上每项3分,限15分;“市优”以上每项2分,限10分;“优良”以上每项1分,限10分。而该单位经营人员认为“省优”是在“优良”的基础上评定的。为证实自己的实力,在投标书中附上了“鲁班奖”三项,“省优”15项,“市优”10项,而未附上“优良”项目(该单位实际有“优良”奖项上百件)。在评定时,评标委员会以其缺项为由,扣去其10分。从而失去了中标的机会。
点击查看答案
在立案审查中,可以采取的侦查措施有()
A.查询
B.勘验、鉴定
C.冻结财产
D.调取证据材料
点击查看答案
机械决定论和辩证决定论的区别在于:()
A . 是否承认必然性和因果联系的客观普遍性
B . 是否承认意识的能动性
C . 是否承认偶然性
D . 是否承认因果联系的复杂性
点击查看答案
If you smoke, you’ d better hurry. From July 1st pubs all over England will, by law, be no-smoking areas. So will restaurants, offices and even company cars, if more than one person uses them. England’s smokers are following a well-trodden path. The other three bits of the United Kingdom have already banned smoking in almost all enclosed public spaces, and there are anti-smoking laws of varying strictness over most of Western Europe. The smoker’s journey from glamour through toleration to suspicion is finally reaching its end in pariah status. But behind this pubhc-health success story lies a darker tale. Poorer people are much more likely to smoke than richer ones--a change from the 1950s, when professionals and laborers were equally keen. Today only 15% of men in the highest professional classes smoke, but 42% of unskilled workers do. Despite punitive taxation--20 cigarettes cost around £ 5.00 ( $10.00), three-quarters of which is tax--55% of single mothers on benefits smoke. The figure for homeless men is even higher; for hard-drug users it is practically 100%. The message that smoking kills has been heard, it seems, but not by all. Having defeated the big killers of the past--want, exposure, poor sanitation-- governments all over the developed world are turning their attention to diseases that stem mostly from how individuals choose to live their lives. But the same deafness afflicts the same people when they are strongly encouraged to give up other sorts of unhealthy behavior. The lower down they are on practically any pecking order--job prestige, income, education, background-the more likely people are to be fat and unfit, and to drink too much. That tempts governments to shout ever louder in an attempt to get the public to listen- and nowhere do they do so more aggressively than in Britain. One reason is that pecking orders matter more than in most other rich countries : income distribution is very unequal and the unemployed, disaffected, ill-educated rump is comparatively large. Another reason is the frustration of a government addicted to targets, which often aim not only to improve something but to lessen inequality in the process. A third is that the National Health Service is free to patients, and paying for those who have arguably brought their ill-health on themselves grows alarmingly costly. Britain’s aggressiveness, however, may be pointless, even counter-productive. There is no reason to believe that those who ignore measured voices will listen to shouting. It irritates the majority who are already behaving responsibly, and it may also undermine all government pronouncements on health by convincing people that they have an ultra-cautious margin of error built in. Such hectoring may also be missing the root cause of the problem. According to Mr. Marmot, who cites research on groups as diverse as baboons in captivity, British civil servants and Oscar nominees, the higher rates of ill health among those in more modest walks of life can be attributed to what he calls the "status syndrome". People in privileged positions think they are worth the effort of behaving healthily, and find the will-power to do so. The implication is that it is easier to improve a person’s health by weakening the connection between social position and health than by targeting behavior directly. Some public-health experts speak of social cohesion, support for families and better education for all. These are bigger undertakings than a bossy campaign; but more effective, and quieter.
A.Because governments all turned their attention to these people.B.Because these people are more likely to have unhealthy behaviors.C.Because these people suffer more from their poor income and education.D.Because governments always neglect the real needs of these people.
点击查看答案
以下搜索引擎中,是我们中国人自己开发的搜索引擎的是()
A.live搜索 B.百度 C.GOOGLE D.搜狗
点击查看答案
客服
TOP