题目内容 (请给出正确答案)
提问人:网友z*****n 发布时间:2023年2月18日 10:25
[单选题]

在社会主义市场经济中,宏观调控与微观搞活的关系是(  )。

A.搞好宏观调控,微观自然搞活 B.完全对立,不可兼得 C.相辅相成,互相统一 D.微观搞活等于搞好了宏观调控

参考答案
十点题库官方参考答案 (由十点题库聘请的专业题库老师提供的解答)
更多“在社会主义市场经济中,宏观调控与微观搞活的关系是(  )。”相关的问题
社会主义制度在中国确立的时间是()。A.1949年B.1952年C.1956年D.1958年
A.1949年
B.1952年
C.1956年
D.1958年
点击查看答案
安全生产标准化建设工作需要全员参与,需要提高全员对安全生产标准化工作的重要性的认识,因此,中小型水利生产经营单位在全面推进安全生产标准化建设之前,必须针对领导层和员工做好宣传培训工作。下列()属于企业领导层安全生产标准化教育培训的主要内容。 
A . 安全生产标准化发展历程
B . 水利安全生产标准化建设流程及评审程序
C . 水利行业安全生产形势
D . 国家对水利行业安全生产标准化法规要求
点击查看答案
冬季施工,抹灰时作业面温度不宜低于()。
A.5℃;
B.10℃;
C.15℃;
D.-5℃
点击查看答案
进入职场的注意事项有哪些?
点击查看答案

 C语言中用于结构化程序设计的三种基本结构是() .


A . 顺序结构、选择结构、循环结构
B . if、 switch、 break
C . for、while、do-while
D . if、for、continue
点击查看答案
什么是不良贷款向外迁徙?
点击查看答案
有一台配电变压器绕组联结组别为Dyn11,变比为nT,二次侧中性点直接接地如图所示。https://assets.asklib.com/psource/2015110409440831882.jpg以下题中I″22K3--变压器二次侧三相短路时二次侧的电流;I″22K2--变压器二次侧两相短路时二次侧的电流;I22K1--变压器二次侧单相接地时二次侧的电流。
A . ['['二次侧发生vw两相短路时,一次侧IW超瞬态短路电流为()。A.https://assets.asklib.com/psource/2015110409470796821.jpg
B .https://assets.asklib.com/psource/2015110409471860485.jpg
C . 0D .https://assets.asklib.com/psource/2015110409472920920.jpg
点击查看答案
阴极保护失去的电子可以由外加()提供。
点击查看答案
竹笋含较多的草酸,影响人体对钙的吸收,烹调前应进行(),以去除草酸。
A、凉水浸泡
B、盐水浸泡
C、悼水处
D、碱水浸泡
点击查看答案
()是维护班级正常教学秩序,建立良好班风的需要。
A.考勤B.自律C.班主任D.考试
点击查看答案
いつも夜道で()歌は学生時代の思い出の歌である。
A.ばらまく
B.くちずさむ
C.さえずる
D.ののしる
点击查看答案
磁电式流比计是兆欧表的测量机构,由固定的永久磁铁和可以在磁场中转动的()线圈组成。
A、2个
B、3个
C、4个
D、多个
点击查看答案
法国的地势是东高西低。
点击查看答案
21-三体综合征父母任意一方为21/21易位携带者,所生子女100%为患者。()
点击查看答案
The relationship between formal education and economic growth in poor countries is widely misunderstood by economists and politicians alike. Progress in both areas is undoubtedly necessary for the social, political and intellectual development of these and all other societies; however, the conventional view that education should be one of the very highest priorities for promoting rapid economic development in poor countries is wrong. We are fortunate that it is, because building new educational systems there and putting enough people through them to improve economic performance would require two or three generations. The findings of a research institution have consistently shown that workers in all countries can be trained on the job to achieve radical higher productivity and, as a result, radically higher standards of living. Ironically, the first evidence for this idea appeared in the United States. Not long ago, with the country entering a recession and Japan at its pre-bubble peak, the U. S. workforce was derided as poorly educated and one of the primary causes of the poor U. S. economic performance. Japan was, and remains, the global leader in automotive-assembly productivity. Yet the research revealed that the U. S. factories of Honda, Nissan, and Toyota achieved about 95 percent of the productivity of their Japanese counterparts as a result of the training that U. S. workers received on the job. More recently, while examining housing construction, the researchers discovered that illiterate, non-English-speaking Mexican workers in Houston, Texas, consistently met best-practice labor productivity standards despite the complexity of the building industry’s work. What is the real relationship between education and economic development We have to suspect that continuing economic growth promotes the development of education even when governments don’t force it. After all, that’s how education got started. When our ancestors were hunters and gatherers 10, 000 years ago, they didn’t have time to wonder much about anything besides finding food. Only when humanity began to get its food in a more productive way was there time for other things. As education improved, humanity’s productivity potential increased as well. When the competitive environment pushed our ancestors to achieve that potential, they could in turn afford more education. This increasingly high level of education is probably a necessary, but not a sufficient, condition for the complex political systems required by advanced economic performance. Thus poor countries might not be able to escape their poverty traps without political changes that may be possible only with broader formal education. A lack of formal education, however, doesn’t constrain the ability of the developing world’s workforce to substantially improve productivity for the foreseeable future. On the contrary, constraints on improving productivity explain why education isn’t developing more quickly there than it is.
A.is subject to groundless doubts.B.has fallen victim of bias.C.is conventionally downgraded.D.has been overestimated.
点击查看答案
客服
TOP