题目内容 (请给出正确答案)
提问人:网友z*****n 发布时间:2023年1月16日 08:00
[单项选择题]

The idea of building "New Towns" to absorb growth is frequently considered a cure-all for urban problems. It is erroneously assumed that if new residents can be diverted from existing centers, the present urban situation at least will get no worse. It is further and equally erroneously assumed that since European New Towns have been financially and socially successful, we can expect the same sorts of results in the United States. Present planning, thinking, and legislation will not produce the kinds of New Town that have been successful abroad. It will multiply suburbs or encourage developments in areas where land is cheap and construction profitable rather than where New Towns are genuinely needed. Such ill-considered projects not only will fail to relieve pressures on existing cities but will, in fact, tend to weaken those cities further by drawing away high-income citizens and increasing the concentration of low-income groups that are unable to provide tax revenues. The remaining taxpayers, accordingly, will face increasing burdens, and industry and commerce will seek escape. Unfortunately, this mechanism is already at work in some metropolitan areas. The promoters of New Towns so far in the United States have been developers, builders, and financial institutions. The main interest of these promoters is economic gain. Furthermore, federal regulations designed to promote the New Town idea do not consider social needs as the European New Town plans do. In fact, our regulations specify virtually all the ingredients of the typical suburban community, with a bit of political rhetoric thrown in. A workable American New Town formula should be established as firmly here as the national formula was in Britain. All possible social and governmental innovations as well as financial factors should be thoroughly considered and accommodated in this policy. Its objectives should be clearly stated, and both incentives and penalties should be provided to ensure that the objectives are pursued. If such a policy is developed, then the New Town approach can play an important role in alleviating America’s urban problems.

The idea of building "New Towns" to absorb growth is frequently considered a cure-all for urban problems. It is erroneously assumed that if new residents can be diverted from existing centers, the present urban situation at least will get no worse. It is further and equally erroneously assumed that since European New Towns have been financially and socially successful, we can expect the same sorts of results in the United States.

Present planning, thinking, and legislation will not produce the kinds of New Town that have been successful abroad. It will multiply suburbs or encourage developments in areas where land is cheap and construction profitable rather than where New Towns are genuinely needed.

Such ill-considered projects not only will fail to relieve pressures on existing cities but will, in fact, tend to weaken those cities further by drawing away high-income citizens and increasing the concentration of low-income groups that are unable to provide tax revenues. The remaining taxpayers, accordingly, will face increasing burdens, and industry and commerce will seek escape. Unfortunately, this mechanism is already at work in some metropolitan areas.

The promoters of New Towns so far in the United States have been developers, builders, and financial institutions. The main interest of these promoters is economic gain. Furthermore, federal regulations designed to promote the New Town idea do not consider social needs as the European New Town plans do. In fact, our regulations specify virtually all the ingredients of the typical suburban community, with a bit of political rhetoric thrown in.

A workable American New Town formula should be established as firmly here as the national formula was in Britain. All possible social and governmental innovations as well as financial factors should be thoroughly considered and accommodated in this policy. Its objectives should be clearly stated, and both incentives and penalties should be provided to ensure that the objectives are pursued. If such a policy is developed, then the New Town approach can play an important role in alleviating America’s urban problems.

参考答案
十点题库官方参考答案 (由十点题库聘请的专业题库老师提供的解答)
更多“ The idea of building "New Tow”相关的问题
全塑电缆芯线由金属导线和绝缘层组成。导线是用来传输电信号的,导线的线质一般为()。
A、铜包钢线
B、电解铜线
C、铁线
点击查看答案
患者女,23岁。凹面型,面下1/3正常,前牙反https://assets.asklib.com/psource/2015120110091219983.jpg,磨牙中性关系,上颌尖牙唇向高位,拥挤9mm。上下前牙唇倾度正常,下牙列无拥挤。侧位片测量显示上颌骨发育不足,ANB-2°。4个第三磨牙牙胚存在若该患者确定是固定正畸治疗,治疗方案可能为下列哪项().
A . A.不拔牙矫治
B . 拔除2个上颌双尖牙
C . 拔除4个第一双尖牙
D . 拔除双侧上颌第二双尖牙和下颌第一双尖牙
E . 拔除4个第二双尖牙
点击查看答案
基础结构施工图主要是表示建筑物在室外地坪以下基础结构的图纸。
点击查看答案
下列动物中盲肠最发达的是()
A.骆驼
B.羊
C.牛
D.马
点击查看答案

在传热实验中用饱和水蒸汽加热空气,总传热系数K接近于         侧的对流传热系数,而壁温接近于        侧流体的温度值

A . 空气饱和水蒸汽B . 饱和水蒸汽;空气C . 空气空气D . 饱和水蒸汽;饱和水蒸汽
点击查看答案
将X射线管靶极金属由钼靶改为钨靶,而管电压和管电流都一定时,所发生连续X射线的线质有何变化?()
A、变硬
B、变软
C、不变
D、随环境而变硬
点击查看答案
LCD液晶屏模块将常用的数字、字符点阵图形的字模存储在()。
A.DDROM
B.CGRAM
C.DDRAM
D.CGROM
点击查看答案
下列哪一项不是学前儿童记忆策略的主要方式()。
A.反复背诵 B.精细加工 C.间接的意义识记 D.使记忆材料系统化
点击查看答案
混凝土面板是面板堆石坝的主要防渗结构,厚度薄、面积大,在满足______条件下,要求具有一定柔性,以适应堆石体的变形。
A.抗压性和耐久性
B.抗渗性和抗压性
C.抗耐性和抗击性
D.抗渗性和耐久性
点击查看答案
某设备安装工程,业主分别与土建和安装单位签订了基础、设备土建和安装工程施工合同。两个承包商都编制了相互协调的进度计划。进度计划已得到批准。基础施工完毕,设备安装单位按计划将材料及设备运进现场,准备施工。经检测发现有10%的设备预埋螺栓位置偏移过大,无法安装设备,须返工处理。安装工作因基础返工而受到影响,安装单位提出索赔要求。
点击查看答案
孕期抽烟对母亲或胎儿造成的影响不包括()。
A . 过期妊娠
B . 低出生体重
C . 流产
D . 早产
E . 新生儿死亡
点击查看答案
建设工程竣工的规划验收是建筑工程审批后管理的重要组成部分,是防止()出现违法行为的重要保证。
A . 工程项目在建设过程中
B . 工程在建设后期
C . 工程项目在建设中后期
D . 工程项目在竣工验收期
点击查看答案
习近平4月1日主持召开深改组第十一次会议并发表重要讲话。他强调,必须从贯彻落实“四个全面”战略布局的高度,不断提高领导、谋划、推动、落实改革的能力和水平,切实做到()。
A . 打铁还需自身硬
B . 抓铁有痕,踏石有印
C . 人民有所呼、改革有所应
D . 把权力关进笼子
点击查看答案
从业人员在安全生产活动中,应当遵循的权利包括( )。
A.获得劳动防护用品的权利
B.遵守本单位的安全生产规章制度和操作规程
C.接受安全生产教育培训的权利
D.从业人员发现事故隐患或者其他不安全因素,应当立即向现场安全生产管理人员或者本单位负责人报告
E.批评权和检举、控告权
点击查看答案
严禁作业人员在两线间行走停留及放置工器具、材料(邻线未停止行车)。
点击查看答案
客服
TOP