题目内容 (请给出正确答案)
提问人:网友13***556 发布时间:2022年4月6日 06:54
[问答题]

什么是重大隐患?如何分级的?

参考答案
十点题库官方参考答案 (由十点题库聘请的专业题库老师提供的解答)
更多“什么是重大隐患?如何分级的?”相关的问题
硬膜外腔注射吗啡可产生哪项作用()
\tA.镇痛
\tB.腹泻
\tC.血压下降
\tD.红斑
\tE.严重的呼吸抑制常见
点击查看答案
某岛屿上的居民与该岛上的草、羊、兔和狐构成的食物网如下图。由于居民大量猎杀狐,导致其濒临灭绝,使兔的数量大量增加,随后由于兔瘟热病毒引起的兔疫使兔的数量大量减少。 (1)食物网中,草的能量通过
点击查看答案
路政管理任务完成的好坏,取决于路政管理队伍的素质,即()
A、政治素质
B、业务水平
C、工作质量
D、经济实力
E、工作效率
点击查看答案
患儿,于9时开始输10%葡萄糖液1000ml,10时30分已快输完。这时,患儿突然出现呼吸困难、气促、咳嗽、咳粉红色泡沫痰。根据患者出现的症状,考虑可能出现()
A.发热反应
B.过敏反应
C.空气栓塞
D.循环负荷过重
E.细菌污染严重
点击查看答案
塔机的安全装置限制器有()。
A.起重力矩限制器
B.起重量限制器
C.超高限位
D.变幅限位
E.回转限位
F.行走限位
点击查看答案
某快锻水压机工作台油缸柱塞如图所示。已知油压p=32MPa,柱塞直径d=120mm,伸入油缸的最大行程l=1600mm,材料为
45钢,E=210GPa。试求柱塞的工作安全因数。

点击查看答案
[单项选择题]制定我国教育目的的理论基础是()
A.个体本位论
B.社会本位论
C.资本主义制度
D.社会主义制度
E.马克思关于人的全面发展学说
点击查看答案
对支气管扩张的患者进行口腔护理是为了()
A . A.去除口臭
B . B.减少感染机会
C . C.促进唾液分泌
D . D.使痰液易咳出
E . E.减少痰量
点击查看答案
阐述信息检索的基本程序。
点击查看答案
交通运输部组织第三方安全评估机构开展运营前安全评估的实际情况和效果进行评价,并向社会公告评价结果,为城市轨道交通运营主管部门选择第三方安全评估机构提供参考()
点击查看答案
U1为A 相电压,电压为正相序,三相电压对地为220V,三相电流均为1.5A,I1U1=140°,I2U1=260°,I3U1=20°,电流接线方式()。
A.WUVB.UVWC.WVU
点击查看答案
简述企业对外投资应当考虑的因素。
点击查看答案
球芯折角塞门塞门芯上面开有一个直径为()的贯通孔。
A.55mm B.45mm C.22mm D.32.5mm
点击查看答案
某公司资产总额为200万元,当发生下列三笔经济业务后:(1)向银行借款20万元存入银行;(2)用银行存款偿还应付账款15万元;(3)收回应收账款10万元存入银行。其负债和所有者权益总计为( )。
A. 205万元 B. 235万元 C. 230万元 D. 245万元
点击查看答案
Text3 The journal Science is adding an extra round of statistical checks to its peer-review process, editor-in-chief Marcia McNutt announced today. The policy follows similar efforts from other journals, after widespread concern that basic mistakes in data analysis are contributing to the irreproducibility of many published research findings. “Readers must have confidence in the conclusions published in our journal,” writes McNutt in an editorial. Working with the American Statistical Association, the journal has appointed seven experts to a statistics board of reviewing editors (SBoRE). Manuscript will be flagged up for additional scrutiny by the journal’s internal editors, or by its existing Board of Reviewing Editors or by outside peer reviewers. The SBoRE panel will then find external statisticians to review these manuscripts. Asked whether any particular papers had impelled the change, McNutt said: “The creation of the ‘statistics board’ was motivated by concerns broadly with the application of statistics and data analysis in scientific research and is part of Science’s overall drive to increase reproducibility in the research we publish.” Giovanni Parmigiani, a biostatistician at the Harvard School of Public Health, a member of the SBoRE group, says he expects the board to “play primarily an advisory role.” He agreed to join because he “found the foresight behind the establishment of the SBoRE to be novel, unique and likely to have a lasting impact. This impact will not only be through the publications in Science itself, but hopefully through a larger group of publishing places that may want to model their approach after Science.”
Text3 The journal Science is adding an extra round of statistical checks to its peer-review process, editor-in-chief Marcia McNutt announced today. The policy follows similar efforts from other journals, after widespread concern that basic mistakes in data analysis are contributing to the irreproducibility of many published research findings. “Readers must have confidence in the conclusions published in our journal,” writes McNutt in an editorial. Working with the American Statistical Association, the journal has appointed seven experts to a statistics board of reviewing editors (SBoRE). Manuscript will be flagged up for additional scrutiny by the journal’s internal editors, or by its existing Board of Reviewing Editors or by outside peer reviewers. The SBoRE panel will then find external statisticians to review these manuscripts. Asked whether any particular papers had impelled the change, McNutt said: “The creation of the ‘statistics board’ was motivated by concerns broadly with the application of statistics and data analysis in scientific research and is part of Science’s overall drive to increase reproducibility in the research we publish.” Giovanni Parmigiani, a biostatistician at the Harvard School of Public Health, a member of the SBoRE group, says he expects the board to “play primarily an advisory role.” He agreed to join because he “found the foresight behind the establishment of the SBoRE to be novel, unique and likely to have a lasting impact. This impact will not only be through the publications in Science itself, but hopefully through a larger group of publishing places that may want to model their approach after Science.”
点击查看答案
客服
TOP