题目内容 (请给出正确答案)
提问人:网友z*****n 发布时间:2023年8月5日 10:59
[判断题]

陆地棉有26条染色体。

参考答案
十点题库官方参考答案 (由十点题库聘请的专业题库老师提供的解答)
更多“陆地棉有26条染色体。”相关的问题
下列资产减值准备中,在符合相关条件时可以转回的有______。
A.坏账准备
B.存货跌价准备
C.无形资产减值准备
D.固定资产减值准备
点击查看答案
不合理包装是在现有条件下可以达到的包装水平而未达到,主要的表现形式有()、()、()。
点击查看答案
患者,38岁,女性,主诉右侧牙齿自发性剧烈疼痛3天。疼痛呈放散性,夜间痛。检查见右侧牙齿未见牙体病损,但右上第一磨牙颊侧近中探及深达根尖部的牙周袋,冷(++),松动Ⅰ度,叩诊(+)。可能的诊断为()。
A . 急性牙髓炎
B . 急性牙龈炎
C . 逆行性牙髓炎
D . 急性根尖周炎
E . 残髓炎
点击查看答案
中兴N600支持GPS。
A.对 B.错
点击查看答案
5s管理就是整理、整顿、()。
A、清扫
B、清洁
C、素养
D、预防
点击查看答案
根据尿中红细胞形态。可分为几类?
点击查看答案
双缩脲比色祛测定蛋白质浓度的原理是
A . 蛋白质分子中的肽键在酸性条件下与二价铜离子作用生成蓝紫色化合物B . 白质分子中的肽键在破性条件下与二价铜离子作用生成蓝紫色化合物C . 蛋白质分子中的肽键在酸性条件下与一价铁离子作用生成蓝紫色化合物D . 蛋白质分子中的肽键在碱性条件下与二价铁离子作用生成蓝紫色化合物E . 蛋白质分子中的氢键在酸性条件下与三价铜离子作用生成蓝紫色化合物B
点击查看答案
Text 3 Sociologists (社会学家) tell us that we are heading for a society leisure. The trend ...Although people spend less time on their jobs, they still feel they do not have enough leisure time because of the following except ______.
A.spending some time with their children
B.doing physical exercises
C.spending some time on learning
D.fulfilling family and social obligations
点击查看答案
作为主备的两台扩音机,使用时应正确转换,切忌造成并机现象。
点击查看答案
同一家庭中,几个已工作的成员都分别在各自的单位里集体投保了家庭财产保险,被保险人也可以合并计算这些保险单的保险金额,但保险金额超过()的部分无效。
A.重置价值 B.保险价值 C.承包金额 D.可保价值
点击查看答案
属于木的有:风、生、青、酸、肝、哭。
点击查看答案
表面粗糙度Ra值越小表示该表面越粗糙,Ra值越大表示该表面越光滑。 (1.0分)
点击查看答案
In many classrooms around the country, teachers are emphasizing, and periodically testing,
"The food was delectable" is different from "the food was detestable," and Shakespeare should not sound like a chemistry textbook.It is a complicated process teaching students to recognize enough words and read at a consistent rate so they can spend their time concentrating on meaning rather than decoding, educators said. And when tackling a book such as "The Giver," one that deals with a boy's discovery that his utopian world comes at the expense of the stifling of intellectual and emotional freedom, meaning is critical."Fluent readers are readers who know how to dig into a book and pull out just what they are looking for—whether it is information, a part with strong language, a part with good character development, or just a chance to read for fun," said Susan Marantz, a longtime teacher now at a suburban school in Columbus, Ohio.Yet u combination of politics, insufficient teacher development and an inherent difficulty in capturing all aspects of fluency have led to questionable instruction practices, according to Richard Allington, a reading researcher and University of Tennessee professor.Many students are asked by teachers to reread the same passages over and over—often with constant interruptions from the teacher. And some struggling readers are given books—including textbooks—that are above their reading level and soon become a source of frustration."You can make any adult a disfluent reader by giving them books that are too hard and jump in and interrupt them a lot," Allington said. "What do you think it does to kids?"As a result, some kids are motivated to read only to beat a test clock, he and other researchers said."The more important question to ask is: Are teachers focusing on all three parts of fluency?" Beers, vice president-elect of the National Council of Teachers of English, wrote in an e-mail. "When fluency is only about building automaticity (and therefore speed), then some (teachers) do mistakenly believe that the point of reading is fast decoding. That's no more the best measure of a skilled reader than fast driving is the best measure of skilled driver."The current interest in reading fluency illustrates the complexities in the long national argument about how best to teach reading, dubbed the "reading wars."Advocates of phonics and literature-based instruction have been at odds for years, with the argument only intensifying after a controversial 2000 report by the National Reading Panel. Many reading experts said the panel relied on a limited set of studies that supported, among other things, intensive drilling in phonics. Reading fluency also was one of the key areas for instruction, along with phonemic awareness and phonics instruction, comprehension, teacher education and computer technology. President Bush used the report as a basis for Reading First, a program to improve reading scores that became the centerpiece of his No Child Let Behind law.Although fluency had long been identified by experts as important, it then became a hot issue.Reading researchers began devising programs to help teachers improve students' fluency. And although there was no consensus definition of fluency, panels approving Reading First money accepted programs that used tools that stressed reading speed, according to some educators. A report by the Department of Education's inspector general this month slammed the grant-approval processing, saying it was riddled with problems and conflicts of interest.The result, said fluency expert Tim Rasinski of Kent State University, was a massage strut to schools to concentrA.synonym withB.antonym withC.irrelevant toD.similar to

It is a complicated process teaching students to recognize enough words and read at a consistent rate so they can spend their time concentrating on meaning rather than decoding, educators said. And when tackling a book such as "The Giver," one that deals with a boy's discovery that his utopian world comes at the expense of the stifling of intellectual and emotional freedom, meaning is critical."Fluent readers are readers who know how to dig into a book and pull out just what they are looking for—whether it is information, a part with strong language, a part with good character development, or just a chance to read for fun," said Susan Marantz, a longtime teacher now at a suburban school in Columbus, Ohio.Yet u combination of politics, insufficient teacher development and an inherent difficulty in capturing all aspects of fluency have led to questionable instruction practices, according to Richard Allington, a reading researcher and University of Tennessee professor.Many students are asked by teachers to reread the same passages over and over—often with constant interruptions from the teacher. And some struggling readers are given books—including textbooks—that are above their reading level and soon become a source of frustration."You can make any adult a disfluent reader by giving them books that are too hard and jump in and interrupt them a lot," Allington said. "What do you think it does to kids?"As a result, some kids are motivated to read only to beat a test clock, he and other researchers said."The more important question to ask is: Are teachers focusing on all three parts of fluency?" Beers, vice president-elect of the National Council of Teachers of English, wrote in an e-mail. "When fluency is only about building automaticity (and therefore speed), then some (teachers) do mistakenly believe that the point of reading is fast decoding. That's no more the best measure of a skilled reader than fast driving is the best measure of skilled driver."The current interest in reading fluency illustrates the complexities in the long national argument about how best to teach reading, dubbed the "reading wars."Advocates of phonics and literature-based instruction have been at odds for years, with the argument only intensifying after a controversial 2000 report by the National Reading Panel. Many reading experts said the panel relied on a limited set of studies that supported, among other things, intensive drilling in phonics. Reading fluency also was one of the key areas for instruction, along with phonemic awareness and phonics instruction, comprehension, teacher education and computer technology. President Bush used the report as a basis for Reading First, a program to improve reading scores that became the centerpiece of his No Child Let Behind law.Although fluency had long been identified by experts as important, it then became a hot issue.Reading researchers began devising programs to help teachers improve students' fluency. And although there was no consensus definition of fluency, panels approving Reading First money accepted programs that used tools that stressed reading speed, according to some educators. A report by the Department of Education's inspector general this month slammed the grant-approval processing, saying it was riddled with problems and conflicts of interest.The result, said fluency expert Tim Rasinski of Kent State University, was a massage strut to schools to concentrA.synonym withB.antonym withC.irrelevant toD.similar to

"Fluent readers are readers who know how to dig into a book and pull out just what they are looking for—whether it is information, a part with strong language, a part with good character development, or just a chance to read for fun," said Susan Marantz, a longtime teacher now at a suburban school in Columbus, Ohio.Yet u combination of politics, insufficient teacher development and an inherent difficulty in capturing all aspects of fluency have led to questionable instruction practices, according to Richard Allington, a reading researcher and University of Tennessee professor.Many students are asked by teachers to reread the same passages over and over—often with constant interruptions from the teacher. And some struggling readers are given books—including textbooks—that are above their reading level and soon become a source of frustration."You can make any adult a disfluent reader by giving them books that are too hard and jump in and interrupt them a lot," Allington said. "What do you think it does to kids?"As a result, some kids are motivated to read only to beat a test clock, he and other researchers said."The more important question to ask is: Are teachers focusing on all three parts of fluency?" Beers, vice president-elect of the National Council of Teachers of English, wrote in an e-mail. "When fluency is only about building automaticity (and therefore speed), then some (teachers) do mistakenly believe that the point of reading is fast decoding. That's no more the best measure of a skilled reader than fast driving is the best measure of skilled driver."The current interest in reading fluency illustrates the complexities in the long national argument about how best to teach reading, dubbed the "reading wars."Advocates of phonics and literature-based instruction have been at odds for years, with the argument only intensifying after a controversial 2000 report by the National Reading Panel. Many reading experts said the panel relied on a limited set of studies that supported, among other things, intensive drilling in phonics. Reading fluency also was one of the key areas for instruction, along with phonemic awareness and phonics instruction, comprehension, teacher education and computer technology. President Bush used the report as a basis for Reading First, a program to improve reading scores that became the centerpiece of his No Child Let Behind law.Although fluency had long been identified by experts as important, it then became a hot issue.Reading researchers began devising programs to help teachers improve students' fluency. And although there was no consensus definition of fluency, panels approving Reading First money accepted programs that used tools that stressed reading speed, according to some educators. A report by the Department of Education's inspector general this month slammed the grant-approval processing, saying it was riddled with problems and conflicts of interest.The result, said fluency expert Tim Rasinski of Kent State University, was a massage strut to schools to concentrA.synonym withB.antonym withC.irrelevant toD.similar to

Yet u combination of politics, insufficient teacher development and an inherent difficulty in capturing all aspects of fluency have led to questionable instruction practices, according to Richard Allington, a reading researcher and University of Tennessee professor.Many students are asked by teachers to reread the same passages over and over—often with constant interruptions from the teacher. And some struggling readers are given books—including textbooks—that are above their reading level and soon become a source of frustration."You can make any adult a disfluent reader by giving them books that are too hard and jump in and interrupt them a lot," Allington said. "What do you think it does to kids?"As a result, some kids are motivated to read only to beat a test clock, he and other researchers said."The more important question to ask is: Are teachers focusing on all three parts of fluency?" Beers, vice president-elect of the National Council of Teachers of English, wrote in an e-mail. "When fluency is only about building automaticity (and therefore speed), then some (teachers) do mistakenly believe that the point of reading is fast decoding. That's no more the best measure of a skilled reader than fast driving is the best measure of skilled driver."The current interest in reading fluency illustrates the complexities in the long national argument about how best to teach reading, dubbed the "reading wars."Advocates of phonics and literature-based instruction have been at odds for years, with the argument only intensifying after a controversial 2000 report by the National Reading Panel. Many reading experts said the panel relied on a limited set of studies that supported, among other things, intensive drilling in phonics. Reading fluency also was one of the key areas for instruction, along with phonemic awareness and phonics instruction, comprehension, teacher education and computer technology. President Bush used the report as a basis for Reading First, a program to improve reading scores that became the centerpiece of his No Child Let Behind law.Although fluency had long been identified by experts as important, it then became a hot issue.Reading researchers began devising programs to help teachers improve students' fluency. And although there was no consensus definition of fluency, panels approving Reading First money accepted programs that used tools that stressed reading speed, according to some educators. A report by the Department of Education's inspector general this month slammed the grant-approval processing, saying it was riddled with problems and conflicts of interest.The result, said fluency expert Tim Rasinski of Kent State University, was a massage strut to schools to concentrA.synonym withB.antonym withC.irrelevant toD.similar to

Many students are asked by teachers to reread the same passages over and over—often with constant interruptions from the teacher. And some struggling readers are given books—including textbooks—that are above their reading level and soon become a source of frustration."You can make any adult a disfluent reader by giving them books that are too hard and jump in and interrupt them a lot," Allington said. "What do you think it does to kids?"As a result, some kids are motivated to read only to beat a test clock, he and other researchers said."The more important question to ask is: Are teachers focusing on all three parts of fluency?" Beers, vice president-elect of the National Council of Teachers of English, wrote in an e-mail. "When fluency is only about building automaticity (and therefore speed), then some (teachers) do mistakenly believe that the point of reading is fast decoding. That's no more the best measure of a skilled reader than fast driving is the best measure of skilled driver."The current interest in reading fluency illustrates the complexities in the long national argument about how best to teach reading, dubbed the "reading wars."Advocates of phonics and literature-based instruction have been at odds for years, with the argument only intensifying after a controversial 2000 report by the National Reading Panel. Many reading experts said the panel relied on a limited set of studies that supported, among other things, intensive drilling in phonics. Reading fluency also was one of the key areas for instruction, along with phonemic awareness and phonics instruction, comprehension, teacher education and computer technology. President Bush used the report as a basis for Reading First, a program to improve reading scores that became the centerpiece of his No Child Let Behind law.Although fluency had long been identified by experts as important, it then became a hot issue.Reading researchers began devising programs to help teachers improve students' fluency. And although there was no consensus definition of fluency, panels approving Reading First money accepted programs that used tools that stressed reading speed, according to some educators. A report by the Department of Education's inspector general this month slammed the grant-approval processing, saying it was riddled with problems and conflicts of interest.The result, said fluency expert Tim Rasinski of Kent State University, was a massage strut to schools to concentrA.synonym withB.antonym withC.irrelevant toD.similar to

"You can make any adult a disfluent reader by giving them books that are too hard and jump in and interrupt them a lot," Allington said. "What do you think it does to kids?"As a result, some kids are motivated to read only to beat a test clock, he and other researchers said."The more important question to ask is: Are teachers focusing on all three parts of fluency?" Beers, vice president-elect of the National Council of Teachers of English, wrote in an e-mail. "When fluency is only about building automaticity (and therefore speed), then some (teachers) do mistakenly believe that the point of reading is fast decoding. That's no more the best measure of a skilled reader than fast driving is the best measure of skilled driver."The current interest in reading fluency illustrates the complexities in the long national argument about how best to teach reading, dubbed the "reading wars."Advocates of phonics and literature-based instruction have been at odds for years, with the argument only intensifying after a controversial 2000 report by the National Reading Panel. Many reading experts said the panel relied on a limited set of studies that supported, among other things, intensive drilling in phonics. Reading fluency also was one of the key areas for instruction, along with phonemic awareness and phonics instruction, comprehension, teacher education and computer technology. President Bush used the report as a basis for Reading First, a program to improve reading scores that became the centerpiece of his No Child Let Behind law.Although fluency had long been identified by experts as important, it then became a hot issue.Reading researchers began devising programs to help teachers improve students' fluency. And although there was no consensus definition of fluency, panels approving Reading First money accepted programs that used tools that stressed reading speed, according to some educators. A report by the Department of Education's inspector general this month slammed the grant-approval processing, saying it was riddled with problems and conflicts of interest.The result, said fluency expert Tim Rasinski of Kent State University, was a massage strut to schools to concentrA.synonym withB.antonym withC.irrelevant toD.similar to

As a result, some kids are motivated to read only to beat a test clock, he and other researchers said."The more important question to ask is: Are teachers focusing on all three parts of fluency?" Beers, vice president-elect of the National Council of Teachers of English, wrote in an e-mail. "When fluency is only about building automaticity (and therefore speed), then some (teachers) do mistakenly believe that the point of reading is fast decoding. That's no more the best measure of a skilled reader than fast driving is the best measure of skilled driver."The current interest in reading fluency illustrates the complexities in the long national argument about how best to teach reading, dubbed the "reading wars."Advocates of phonics and literature-based instruction have been at odds for years, with the argument only intensifying after a controversial 2000 report by the National Reading Panel. Many reading experts said the panel relied on a limited set of studies that supported, among other things, intensive drilling in phonics. Reading fluency also was one of the key areas for instruction, along with phonemic awareness and phonics instruction, comprehension, teacher education and computer technology. President Bush used the report as a basis for Reading First, a program to improve reading scores that became the centerpiece of his No Child Let Behind law.Although fluency had long been identified by experts as important, it then became a hot issue.Reading researchers began devising programs to help teachers improve students' fluency. And although there was no consensus definition of fluency, panels approving Reading First money accepted programs that used tools that stressed reading speed, according to some educators. A report by the Department of Education's inspector general this month slammed the grant-approval processing, saying it was riddled with problems and conflicts of interest.The result, said fluency expert Tim Rasinski of Kent State University, was a massage strut to schools to concentrA.synonym withB.antonym withC.irrelevant toD.similar to

"The more important question to ask is: Are teachers focusing on all three parts of fluency?" Beers, vice president-elect of the National Council of Teachers of English, wrote in an e-mail. "When fluency is only about building automaticity (and therefore speed), then some (teachers) do mistakenly believe that the point of reading is fast decoding. That's no more the best measure of a skilled reader than fast driving is the best measure of skilled driver."The current interest in reading fluency illustrates the complexities in the long national argument about how best to teach reading, dubbed the "reading wars."Advocates of phonics and literature-based instruction have been at odds for years, with the argument only intensifying after a controversial 2000 report by the National Reading Panel. Many reading experts said the panel relied on a limited set of studies that supported, among other things, intensive drilling in phonics. Reading fluency also was one of the key areas for instruction, along with phonemic awareness and phonics instruction, comprehension, teacher education and computer technology. President Bush used the report as a basis for Reading First, a program to improve reading scores that became the centerpiece of his No Child Let Behind law.Although fluency had long been identified by experts as important, it then became a hot issue.Reading researchers began devising programs to help teachers improve students' fluency. And although there was no consensus definition of fluency, panels approving Reading First money accepted programs that used tools that stressed reading speed, according to some educators. A report by the Department of Education's inspector general this month slammed the grant-approval processing, saying it was riddled with problems and conflicts of interest.The result, said fluency expert Tim Rasinski of Kent State University, was a massage strut to schools to concentrA.synonym withB.antonym withC.irrelevant toD.similar to

The current interest in reading fluency illustrates the complexities in the long national argument about how best to teach reading, dubbed the "reading wars."Advocates of phonics and literature-based instruction have been at odds for years, with the argument only intensifying after a controversial 2000 report by the National Reading Panel. Many reading experts said the panel relied on a limited set of studies that supported, among other things, intensive drilling in phonics. Reading fluency also was one of the key areas for instruction, along with phonemic awareness and phonics instruction, comprehension, teacher education and computer technology. President Bush used the report as a basis for Reading First, a program to improve reading scores that became the centerpiece of his No Child Let Behind law.Although fluency had long been identified by experts as important, it then became a hot issue.Reading researchers began devising programs to help teachers improve students' fluency. And although there was no consensus definition of fluency, panels approving Reading First money accepted programs that used tools that stressed reading speed, according to some educators. A report by the Department of Education's inspector general this month slammed the grant-approval processing, saying it was riddled with problems and conflicts of interest.The result, said fluency expert Tim Rasinski of Kent State University, was a massage strut to schools to concentrA.synonym withB.antonym withC.irrelevant toD.similar to

Advocates of phonics and literature-based instruction have been at odds for years, with the argument only intensifying after a controversial 2000 report by the National Reading Panel. Many reading experts said the panel relied on a limited set of studies that supported, among other things, intensive drilling in phonics. Reading fluency also was one of the key areas for instruction, along with phonemic awareness and phonics instruction, comprehension, teacher education and computer technology. President Bush used the report as a basis for Reading First, a program to improve reading scores that became the centerpiece of his No Child Let Behind law.Although fluency had long been identified by experts as important, it then became a hot issue.Reading researchers began devising programs to help teachers improve students' fluency. And although there was no consensus definition of fluency, panels approving Reading First money accepted programs that used tools that stressed reading speed, according to some educators. A report by the Department of Education's inspector general this month slammed the grant-approval processing, saying it was riddled with problems and conflicts of interest.The result, said fluency expert Tim Rasinski of Kent State University, was a massage strut to schools to concentrA.synonym withB.antonym withC.irrelevant toD.similar to

Although fluency had long been identified by experts as important, it then became a hot issue.Reading researchers began devising programs to help teachers improve students' fluency. And although there was no consensus definition of fluency, panels approving Reading First money accepted programs that used tools that stressed reading speed, according to some educators. A report by the Department of Education's inspector general this month slammed the grant-approval processing, saying it was riddled with problems and conflicts of interest.The result, said fluency expert Tim Rasinski of Kent State University, was a massage strut to schools to concentrA.synonym withB.antonym withC.irrelevant toD.similar to

Reading researchers began devising programs to help teachers improve students' fluency. And although there was no consensus definition of fluency, panels approving Reading First money accepted programs that used tools that stressed reading speed, according to some educators. A report by the Department of Education's inspector general this month slammed the grant-approval processing, saying it was riddled with problems and conflicts of interest.The result, said fluency expert Tim Rasinski of Kent State University, was a massage strut to schools to concentrA.synonym withB.antonym withC.irrelevant toD.similar to

The result, said fluency expert Tim Rasinski of Kent State University, was a massage strut to schools to concentrA.synonym withB.antonym withC.irrelevant toD.similar to

A.synonym withB.antonym withC.irrelevant toD.similar to

B.antonym withC.irrelevant toD.similar to

C.irrelevant toD.similar to

D.similar to
点击查看答案
黄、黄绿、绿色的配色,为()
A.同色相
B.类似色相
C.互补色相
D.对比色相
点击查看答案
采用复式记帐法时,任何经济业务都是在两个帐户中登记。
A.对 B.错
点击查看答案
客服
TOP