更多“第一次以分权学说来为资产阶级用民主形式组织国家进行经验总结并”相关的问题
把填料放入填料筒时，两根之间的搭口应相互错开（）。
\tA.90°
\tB.120°
\tC.180°
\tD.240°
点击查看答案
大企业的工资水平通常比较高，主要是因为（）。
A.大企业的生产过程相互依赖程度较高，因而需要对员工施加较大的约束，高工资属于一种补偿性工资差别
B.企业规模越大，对员工进行直接监督的成本越高，因而就越需要采用效率工资等方案来对员工进行激励
C.大企业往往是劳动力市场价格的制定者。而不是劳动力市场价格的接受者
D.大企业的劳动力供给弹性更大一些
E.大企业中一旦出现职位空缺.会给企业带来较高的成本，因此需要用高工资降低员工的离职率
点击查看答案
一位来访者单位的同事，要求了解当事人心理治疗的情况，心理治疗师婉言谢绝，这是因为（）。
点击查看答案
已知电压的瞬时值表达式为u=380sin(314t+90°)V,则该电压的有效值为()。
A . 110VB . 220VC . 269VD . 400V
点击查看答案
甲（15周岁）在与他人共同拐卖妇女儿童的犯罪中，对被拐卖的幼女实施了奸淫行为，对于行为人甲而言，下列说法正确的是（）。
A . 应当以强奸罪定罪处罚
B . 应当从轻或减轻处罚
C . 不适用死刑
D . 一般不判处无期徒刑和附加剥夺政治权利
点击查看答案
生产负荷是波动的，通过（）保证系统物料不积累。
A.更换不同尺寸的阀门
B.减小出料管线的尺寸
C.调节程序旋转阀转速满足系统出料的不同速度
D.反吹系统
点击查看答案
失业率是指失业人数在( )人数中所占的比例。
A．总人口
B．劳动年龄人口
C．劳动力人数
D．就业人数
点击查看答案
质量为M的质点A位于坐标系OXY的原点固定不动。在它的万有引力作用下，质量为m的质点B沿逆时针方向做半径为R的圆轨道运动，如图。取圆周上的P为参考点计算力矩。设某时刻质点B运动到Y的正半轴上，以下结论正确的是【图片】
A. 质点 B 此刻受到的引力力矩大小为 GMm / R , 方向垂直屏幕向外B. 质点 B 此刻受到的引力力矩大小为 GMm / R , 方向垂直屏幕向内C. 质点 B 此刻受到的引力力矩大小为 , 方向垂直屏幕向外D. 质点 B 此刻受到的引力力矩大小为 , 方向垂直屏幕向内
点击查看答案
更换横梁短枕作业的目的是（）
A.保证桥上线路结合部几何尺寸符合规定B.保证桥上整体刚度符合规定C.保证横梁短轨数量D.确保设备状态良好
点击查看答案
薄抹灰外墙外保温系统：50mm以下厚度聚苯板(EPS、XPS)厚度允许偏差不应大于( )mm
A.0
B、±1.5
C、±2.0
D、±2.5
点击查看答案
（）提出了“少，就是好”的极限主义审美原则。
A.马克斯·比尔
B.汉斯·古格洛特
C.迪特·兰姆斯
D.伊姆斯夫妇
点击查看答案
决定社会信息流量的最根本因素是（）。
A.传播环境
B.社会的普遍需求
C.社会文化背景
D.经济状况
点击查看答案
学前教育目的是一定社会根据自身的政治、经济、文化发展的要求及受教育者身心发展状况确定的关于学前期儿童发展及其培养目标的（）。 它反映一定社会对学前期儿童的要求，是学前教育工作的（）和最终目标，也是制定学前教育目标、确定学前教育内容、选择学前教育方法、评价学前教育效果的（）。
点击查看答案
Parents of the approximately 2,00,000 home-schooled children in California are reeling from the possibility that they may have to shutter their classrooms—and go back to school themselves—if they want to continue teaching their own kids. On Feb. 28, Judge H. Walter Croskey of the Second District Court of Appeals in Los Angeles ruled that children ages 6 to 18 may be taught only by credentialed teachers in public or private schools—or at home by Morn and Dad, but only if they have a teaching degree. Citing state law that goes back to the early 1950s, Croskey declared that "California courts have held that under provisions in the Education Code, parents do not have a constitutional right to home school their children. " Furthermore, the judge wrote, if instructors teach without credentials they will be subject to criminal action. This news raised a furor among home schooling advocates, including government officials. "Every California child deserves a quality education and parents should have the right to decide what’s best for their children," Governor Arnold Schwarzenegger said in a statement today. "Parents should not be penalized for acting in the best interests of their children’s education. This outrageous ruling must be overturned by the courts and if the courts don’t protect parents’ rights then, as elected officials, we will. " "It’s kind of scary," says Julie Beth Lamb, an Oakdale, California, parent who, with no teaching credentials, has taught her four children for 15 years. "If that ruling is held up, this would make us one of the most restrictive states in the nation. " The debacle originated with a suit over child abuse. One of the eight children of Philip and Mary Long, a Los Angeles couple, had filed a complaint of abuse and neglect with the L. A. Department of Children and Family Services (DCFS). The agency determined that the Long children were being home schooled, taught by their uncredentialed mother while officially enrolled in independent study at Sunland Christian School. The DCFS then turned to the courts to mandate that the children attend public school so that teachers might spot evidence of abuse, a charge the parents deny. A juvenile court, however, determined that the Longs had a constitutional right to home school their children. The DCFS appealed and the case landed in Croskey’s appellate court. For years, the state of California has allowed parents to home school as long as they file papers to create a private school and hire a tutor with credentials or if their child participates in an independent study program through a credentialed school. In evaluating the Long case, however, Judge Croskey found that state law forbade any home schooling that was not taught by a credentialed teacher and that what California had been allowing was, in his judicial opinion, illegal. In 1953, another appellate court ruled against home schooling parents who didn’t want to adhere to California’s compulsory education laws, which require kids between 6 and 18 to attend a credentialed school. The current case is most likely to be appealed to California’s Supreme Court. "We weren’t trying to change the law on home schooling," says Leslie Heimov of the Children’s Law Center, which represents the Long children involved in the case. "The law is accurate—it hasn’t changed since the 1950s. " She says the Center does not even have an opinion on home schooling. They just wanted to do what was best for the children represented in the case. The fact that this sweeping ruling has sprung from such an individualized case is what has most outraged home schooling advocates. "Public schools are not a solution to the problem of child abuse," says Leslie Buchanan, president of the Home School Association of California. Jack O’ Connell, California State Superintendent of Public Instruction—the equivalent of a department of education—now faces the potential crisis of dealing with tens of thousands of truants. Does he know what will happen next "I honestly don’t know," O’Connell says, adding that his department is reviewing the case. "There is some angst in the field. \
A．instructors with credentials in private schoolsB．credentialed teachers in public schoolC．parents with teaching degreesD．parents working in schools no matter what their job is
点击查看答案
题目内容
（请给出正确答案）
参考答案
十点题库官方参考答案
（由十点题库聘请的专业题库老师提供的解答）
