题目内容 (请给出正确答案)
提问人:网友w*****2 发布时间:2024年4月23日 22:28
[判断题]

非涉密网络可以储存、处理、传递涉密信息()

参考答案
十点题库官方参考答案 (由十点题库聘请的专业题库老师提供的解答)
更多“非涉密网络可以储存、处理、传递涉密信息()”相关的问题
公开原则又称信息公开原则,其核心要求是()。
A.参与交易的各方应当获得平等的机会
B.交易各方要及时公布有关信息
C.实现市场信息的公开化
D.上市公司对重大事项及时向社会公布
点击查看答案
按公众的发展过程分类,潜在公众,是指()。
A.尚未与政府机构发生关系的公众,他们既不受政府机构的影响,又不对政府机构的运行产生影响,但在一定条件下,它们又很可能与政府机构发生联系而成为政府的公众 B.由于政府的行为,事实上已与政府面临共同问题和利益关系,但本身并未意识到的公众 C.已意识到了同政府机构面临的共同问题和利益关系的公众 D.开始关注他们所面临的问题,并采取了行动,产生了对政府有利的或不利的影响和作用的公众
点击查看答案
正火碳钢截面相等的圆形与矩形两种试样拉伸,圆形试样的断面收缩率和断后伸长率较高。
点击查看答案
You can not see the manager()you have made an appointment with him.
A、 if
B、 except
C、 unless
D、 when
点击查看答案
韦氏成人量表(WAIS)全表含分测验有()
A.5个
B.7个
C.9个
D.11个
E.13个
点击查看答案
《礼记·大传》云:“庶子不祭,明其宗也。”这反映了()。
A.皇帝制B.井田制C.禅让制D.宗法制
点击查看答案
终身保险的费率高于定期寿险的费率。
点击查看答案
企业自备铁路货车须在铁路货车两侧(墙)规定位置涂打企业自备铁路货车的名称及所在局简称标记()
A.产权单位
B.制造单位
C.检修单位
D.铁路局
点击查看答案
白血病热毒炽盛证( )
A.黄连解毒汤合清营汤加减
B.知柏地黄丸合二至丸加减
C.归脾汤
D.当归补血汤
E.温胆汤合桃红四物汤加减
点击查看答案
试述在物价上涨时,政府对实际工资的保证通常采取哪些主要的方法?
点击查看答案
下列哪些物理信道承载L1/L2的控制消息()
A、PCFICHB、PDCCHC、PHICH
点击查看答案
由工作班组现场操作时,若不填用操作票,应将设备的()及操作内容等按操作顺序填写在工作票上。
A . 双重名称
B . 线路的名称
C . 杆号
D . 位置
E . 工作地点
点击查看答案
下列关于矿区基本控制网精度要求的说法中正确的是()。
A . 矿区地面平面和高程控制网应尽可能采用统一的国家3。带高斯平面坐标系统
B . 矿区面积小予100km2且无发展可能时,可采用独立坐标系统
C . 近井点可在矿区三、四等三角网、测边网或边角网的基础上测设
D . 井口高程基点的高程精度应满足两相邻井口间进行主要巷道贯通的要求
E . 矿区高程尽可能采用l985国家高程基准,当无此条件时,方可采用假定高程系统
点击查看答案
外购存货的成本包括()。
A.买价
B.支付的增值税
C.运输途中合理损耗
D.入库前的整理挑选费
点击查看答案
Directions: In this part, you will have 15 minutes to go over the passage quickly and ans
Directions: In this part, you will have 15 minutes to go over the passage quickly and answer the questions on Answer Sheet 1. For questions 1-7, choose the best answer from the four choices marked A), B), C) and D). For questions 8-10, complete the sentences with the information given in the passage. Universities Branch Out As never before in their long history, universities have become instruments of national competition as well as instruments of peace. They are the place of the scientific discoveries that move economies forward, and the primary means of educating the talent required to obtain and maintain competitive advantage. But at the same time, the opening of national borders to the flow of goods, services, information and especially people has made universities a powerful force for global integration, mutual understanding and geopolitical stability. In response to the same forces that have driven the world economy, universities have become more self-consciously global: seeking students from around the world who represent the entire range of cultures and values, sending their own students abroad to prepare them for global careers, offering course of study that address the challenges of an interconnected world and collaborative (合作的) research programs to advance science for the benefit of all humanity. Of the forces shaping higher education none is more sweeping than the movement across borders. Over the past three decades the number of students leaving home each year to study abroad has grown at an annual rate of 3.9 percent, from 800,000 in 1975 to 2.5 million in 2004. Most travel from one developed nation to another, but the flow from developing to developed countries is growing rapidly. The reverse flow, from developed to developing countries, is on the rise, too. Today foreign students earn 30 percent of the doctoral degrees awarded in the United States and 38 percent of those in the United Kingdom. And the number crossing borders for undergraduate study is growing as well, to 8 percent of the undergraduates at America's best institutions and 10 percent of all undergraduates in the U.K. In the United States, 20 percent of the newly hired professors in science and engineering are foreign-born, and in China many newly hired faculty members at the top research universities received their graduate education abroad. Universities are also encouraging students to spend some of their undergraduate years in another country. In Europe, more than 140,000 students participate in the Erasmus program each year, taking courses for credit in one of 2,200 participating institutions across the continent. And in the United States, institutions are helping place students in the summer internships (实习) abroad to prepare them for global careers. Yale and Harvard have led the way, offering every undergraduate at least one international study or internship opportunity—and providing the financial resources to make it possible. Globalization is also reshaping the way research is done. One new trend involves sourcing portions of a research program to another country. Yale professor and Howard Hughes Medical Institute investigator Tian Xu directs a research center focused on the genetics of human disease at Shanghai's Fudan University, in collaboration with faculty colleagues from both schools. The Shanghai center has 95 employees and graduate students working in a 4,300-square-meter laboratory seminars with scientists from both campuses. The arrangement benefits both countries; Xu's Yale lab is more productive, thanks to the lower costs of conducting research in China, and Chinese graduate students, postdoctors and faculty get on-the-job training from a world-class scientist and his U.S. team. As a result of its strength in science, the United States has consistently led the world in the commercialization of major new technologies, from the mainframe. computer and the integrated circuit of the 1960s to the Internet infrastructure (基础设施) and applications software of the 1990s. the link between university-based science and industrial application is often indirect but sometimes highly visible: Silicon Valley was intentionally created by Stanford University, and Route 128 outside Boston has long housed companies spun off from MIT and Harvard. Around the world, governments have encouraged copying of this model, perhaps most successfully in Cambridge, England, where Microsoft and scores of other leading software and biotechnology companies have set up shop around the university. For all its success, the United States remains deeply hesitant about sustaining the research- university model. Most politicians recognize the link between investment in science and national economic strength, but support for research funding has been unsteady. The budget of the National Institutes of Health doubled between 1998 and 2003, but has risen more slowly than inflation since then. Support for the physical sciences and engineering barely kept pace with inflation during that same period. The attempt to make up lost ground is welcome, but the nation would be better served by steady, predictable increases in science funding at the rate of long-term GDP growth, which is on the order of inflation plus 3 percent per year. American politicians have great difficult recognizing that admitting more foreign students can greatly promote the national interest by increasing international understanding. Adjusted for inflation, public funding for international exchanges and foreign-language study is well below the levels of 40 years ago, in the wake of September 11, changes in the visa process caused a dramatic decline in the number of foreign students seeking admission to U.S. universities, and a corresponding surge in enrollments in Australia, Singapore and the U.K. Objections from American university and the business leaders led to improvements in the process and reversal of the decline, but the United States is still seen by many as unwelcoming to international students. Most Americans recognize that universities contribute to the nation's well-being through their scientific research, but many fear that foreign students threaten American competitiveness by taking their knowledge and skills back home. They fail to grasp that welcoming foreign students to the United States has two important positive effects: first, the very best of them stay in the States and— like immigrants throughout history—strengthen the nation; and second, foreign students who study in the United States become ambassadors for many of its most cherished (珍视) values when they return home. Or at least they understand them better. In America as elsewhere, few instruments of foreign policy are as effective in promoting peace and stability as welcoming international university students. 1.From the first paragraph we know that present –day universities have become A.more and more research-oriented B.in-service training organizations C.more popularized than ever before D.a powerful force for global integration
点击查看答案
客服
TOP